1937
Every score so far: 7.7 · 7.75 · 8
3 people have written a mark out of 10 for 1937, against a floor of 5 for showing a median. The scores are above because they are real; the median is not, because at this count one more post moves it anywhere.
Another 2 review posts named 1937 in the title but have since been deleted from Reddit. They are excluded from every number on this page, not just from the quotes below — so 9 of 11 (82%) is what any of this rests on. Deleted posts get no link: a dead one reads as a made-up one.
1 quoteWhat reviewers actually wrote
Pulled from the bodies of the reviews these numbers are counted from — the ones whose author scored the product 6 or less first, then the ones who scored it 8 or more, each side newest first, up to six a side. The quote is the illustration; the score next to it is the evidence, and both come from the same person. If one side is short, that is the data: only 74 of the site's 739 scores are 6 or lower, so low-scored quotes are scarce everywhere. Each quote links back to the original post — a deleted post is left out rather than linked to a blank page. Sentences are picked by script and checked to read the same way on their own as they did in context.
A couple of days ago, in a galaxy far, far away I saw someone post this product on here from a dispo in Queens.
this reviewer scored it 8/10 (single item)Jan 28, 2025
4 reviewsBy format
Reviews split by how the product is consumed. Scores are the reviewers' own out-of-10 marks.
| Format | Reviews | Median score | Scored 6 or less | Every score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flower | 4 | no scores | — | — |
3 strains · 4 reviewsProducts reviewed
| Strain | Reviews | Scores | Median score | Every score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wedding Cake | 2 | 1 | below limit | 8 |
| Superboof | 1 | 0 | no scores | |
| Glitter Bomb | 1 | 0 | no scores |
Product-level counts are mostly single digits, which is why nothing here is ranked and most rows show the scores instead of a median.
18 months · 237 mentionsHow much it is discussed
This is discussion volume, not quality — a recall or a controversy pushes the line up just as much as praise does. Monthly mentions across posts and comments, Jan 2025 through Jun 2026.
11 mentions fall before Apr 2025 and are not drawn: the line starts at the first month whose mentions carried into the next two, not at the first mention ever. They are in the monthly table below and in every all-time count on this page. Month-to-month swings here are too large to call a direction. The line is what happened; we are not going to tell you it is a trend.
Show the monthly numbers
| Month | Mentions | Per 1,000 discussions |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 2025 | 5 | 0.6 |
| Feb 2025 | 6 | 0.8 |
| Mar 2025 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Apr 2025 | 6 | 0.6 |
| May 2025 | 5 | 0.6 |
| Jun 2025 | 20 | 2.7 |
| Jul 2025 | 16 | 2.0 |
| Aug 2025 | 12 | 1.5 |
| Sep 2025 | 7 | 1.0 |
| Oct 2025 | 16 | 2.2 |
| Nov 2025 | 11 | 1.2 |
| Dec 2025 | 9 | 1.0 |
| Jan 2026 | 16 | 1.8 |
| Feb 2026 | 22 | 2.7 |
| Mar 2026 | 27 | 2.9 |
| Apr 2026 | 31 | 3.5 |
| May 2026 | 13 | 1.7 |
| Jun 2026 | 15 | 2.1 |