Rec Roots
Every score so far: 8
1 person has written a mark out of 10 for Rec Roots, against a floor of 5 for showing a median. The score is above because it is real; the median is not, because at this count one more post moves it anywhere.
Another 1 review post named Rec Roots in the title but has since been deleted from Reddit. They are excluded from every number on this page, not just from the quotes below — so 6 of 7 (86%) is what any of this rests on. Deleted posts get no link: a dead one reads as a made-up one.
1 quoteWhat reviewers actually wrote
Pulled from the bodies of the reviews these numbers are counted from — the ones whose author scored the product 6 or less first, then the ones who scored it 8 or more, each side newest first, up to six a side. The quote is the illustration; the score next to it is the evidence, and both come from the same person. If one side is short, that is the data: only 74 of the site's 739 scores are 6 or lower, so low-scored quotes are scarce everywhere. Each quote links back to the original post — a deleted post is left out rather than linked to a blank page. Sentences are picked by script and checked to read the same way on their own as they did in context.
But I have found some good options.
this reviewer scored it 8/10 (stated overall)Jan 30, 2025
5 reviewsBy format
Reviews split by how the product is consumed. Scores are the reviewers' own out-of-10 marks.
| Format | Reviews | Median score | Scored 6 or less | Every score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flower | 4 | no scores | — | — |
| Prerolls | 1 | n=1 · below limit | 0 of 1 | 8 |
2 strains · 3 reviewsProducts reviewed
| Strain | Reviews | Scores | Median score | Every score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pink Runtz | 2 | 1 | below limit | 8 |
| Gelato | 1 | 0 | no scores |
Product-level counts are mostly single digits, which is why nothing here is ranked and most rows show the scores instead of a median.