Rolling Green

Every score, lowest first: 7 · 7 · 7 · 7.3 · 7.5 · 8 · 8 · 8 · 8 · 8.5 · 8.67 · 8.9 · 9 · 9 · 9 · 10 → median 8.00

16 people who reviewed Rolling Green wrote a mark out of 10 in their post. Those are the numbers above, all of them, and the median is the middle one. None of them came in at 6 or less. The median itself is pinned between 7.3 and 9: that band is where the median of a fresh sample this size would land about 98% of the time. It is not where the scores themselves fall — 12 of these 16 do.

Another 15 review posts named Rolling Green in the title but have since been deleted from Reddit. They are excluded from every number on this page, not just from the quotes below — so 44 of 59 (75%) is what any of this rests on. Deleted posts get no link: a dead one reads as a made-up one.

6 quotesWhat reviewers actually wrote

Pulled from the bodies of the reviews these numbers are counted from — the ones whose author scored the product 6 or less first, then the ones who scored it 8 or more, each side newest first, up to six a side. The quote is the illustration; the score next to it is the evidence, and both come from the same person. If one side is short, that is the data: only 74 of the site's 739 scores are 6 or lower, so low-scored quotes are scarce everywhere. Each quote links back to the original post — a deleted post is left out rather than linked to a blank page. Sentences are picked by script and checked to read the same way on their own as they did in context.

35 reviewsBy format

Reviews split by how the product is consumed. Scores are the reviewers' own out-of-10 marks.

12 strains · 20 reviewsProducts reviewed

Product-level counts are mostly single digits, which is why nothing here is ranked and most rows show the scores instead of a median.

18 months · 1,352 mentionsHow much it is discussed

This is discussion volume, not quality — a recall or a controversy pushes the line up just as much as praise does. Monthly mentions across posts and comments, Jan 2025 through Jun 2026.

Mentions over the last six months ran 63% below the first six. That gap is larger than this brand's own month-to-month swings — we test 299 brands at once, and the set we label has a 95% chance of containing no false call at all.

← All brands